Viewpoints
High loan yields signal a buying opportunity (part two)

Timely insights from portfolio managers and industry experts on key financial, economic and political issues.

The views expressed in these posts are those of the authors and are current only through the date stated. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and Eaton Vance disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions for Eaton Vance are based on many factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance strategy. The discussion herein is general in nature and is provided for informational purposes only. There is no guarantee as to its accuracy or completeness.

  • All Posts
  • More
    Topics
      Authors
      The article below is presented as a single post. Click here to view all posts.

      By Andrew SveenCo-Director of Floating-Rate Loans, Eaton Vance Management and Christopher RemingtonInstitutional Portfolio Manager, Eaton Vance Management

      This is the second in a short series of blogs in which we will explain why we believe loans currently offer an attractive buying opportunity.

      Boston - Last week, we outlined some of the reasons loans are the highest-yielding major fixed-income sector, as of August 31, 2019, eclipsing both high-yield bonds and emerging-markets debt. Loan yields are also high relative to their historical returns.

      However, some investors may be asking whether a lower-rate environment will lead to subpar performance from loans, which have interest payments that float with short-term rates. It's a fair question. While every economic environment is different, we have three prior cycles over the past 20 years in which the U.S. Federal Reserve cut rates, and the track record of loans over those periods can be very instructive.

      The chart below compares loans, the Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index (the Agg), and stocks, based on the average annual total return over the three years following each initial cut by the Fed.

      For the periods following each of the past three cuts, starting in 1998, loans have returned 4.44%, 5.34% and 4.93%, respectively. For comparison, loans have had a long-term average annual return of 4.89% since the S&P/LSTA Index began keeping track in 1997 - that exact figure also happens to be the average of the three periods cited. In other words, facts show that the performance of loans in rate-cut environments has been broadly quite similar to their long-term average, not worse, as popular belief would have it.

      FRL918

      How have loans kept pace with their long-term average when rates were falling? Because other factors that affect loan prices (and total return) can offset lower coupon payments, such as:

      • Fed rate cutting is generally stimulative of the economy, and thus supportive of corporate issuers.
      • Falling short-term rates can be "credit positive" in terms of a company's ability to service its debt.
      • A Fed that's "ready to act" can boost investor confidence and by extension, can be good for asset prices.

      So while falling rates have the potential for lower coupon income, there are a variety of other factors that can serve as a positive offset in terms of total return.

      The chart also shows how the Agg has outperformed loans over the past three periods, by a wide margin. But today's environment is different in a key respect. Falling-rate environments generally favor the Agg, because it has longer duration than loans (which is close to zero) - by definition, bonds with longer duration gain more in price when rates fall. However, in the previous three periods when the Fed began lowering rates, the initial yields on the Agg were all greater than 5%, compared with just 2.1% on August 31, 2019. So today there is much less room for the yield compression that drove gains in the Agg previously.

      Bottom line: Investors who equate accommodative Fed policy with subpar loan performance should review the encouraging history of loans in falling-rate environments. Our next blog will examine the importance of active management at this point in the credit cycle.

      Unless otherwise stated, index returns do not reflect the effect of any applicable sales charges, commissions, expenses, taxes or leverage, as applicable. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Data provided is for informational use only. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

      Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Index is an unmanaged index of domestic investment-grade bonds, including corporate, government and mortgage-backed securities

      S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index is an unmanaged index of the institutional leveraged loan market

      Standard & Poor's 500 Index is an unmanaged index of large-cap stocks commonly used as a measure of U.S. stock market performance