Opportunity persists in EM debt despite recent volatility

Timely insights from portfolio managers and industry experts on key financial, economic and political issues.

The views expressed in these posts are those of the authors and are current only through the date stated. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and Eaton Vance disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions for Eaton Vance are based on many factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance strategy. The discussion herein is general in nature and is provided for informational purposes only. There is no guarantee as to its accuracy or completeness.

  • All Posts
  • More
      The article below is presented as a single post. Click here to view all posts.

      By Emerging Markets Debt TeamEaton Vance Management

      Boston: Emerging-markets debt (EM debt) has hit a bit of a speed bump recently, as investors have reacted to concerns over trade wars, global growth and the shifting political landscape in Argentina. The macro volatility was a marked shift from a broadly favorable environment for the first half of the year, driven by the dovish policy of the world's central banks.

      After a strong first half, the three major J.P. Morgan EM debt indexes lost ground. In the week ended August 16, the J.P. Morgan Emerging Market Bond Index (EMBI) lost 0.67%; the J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index - Emerging Markets (GBI-EM) lost 0.48% and the J.P. Morgan Corporate Emerging Markets Bond Index (CEMBI) lost 0.28%.

      Fund flows tell a similar story. In the first half of 2019, $45.1 billion flowed into EM debt funds, compared with $18.7 billion in 2018, according to J.P. Morgan. But in the past two weeks, those flows turned negative.

      Despite the volatility, we are still constructive on the asset class. We have maintained that as the rally matured, country selection would become more important, and there are indeed a number of bright spots.

      For example, amid all the news and noise last week, Ukraine posted a great Q2 GDP number. Ukraine has a reformer president, Volodymyr Zelensky, who rode to victory on a strong wave of discontent earlier in the year, and in the past few weeks his party secured a parliamentary majority. We have seen macroeconomic stabilization, and now we expect significant improvements on governance and corruption. With fundamental improvement like this, we think the country has great potential.

      Another nice data point that didn't make the news last week was the strength of Egypt's non-oil exports. Egypt's reform progress over the past two years has been impressive. The budget has been improving remarkably, and most recently, the country has achieved a surplus in the primary budget. Interest rates on Egypt's debt are still well in the double digits, and we feel the compensation is quite good for a country with these kinds of improving fundamentals.

      It should be noted that neither Egypt nor Ukraine is in the local currency index, J.P. Morgan's GBI-EM, which underscores our belief that much of the potential of EM debt lies outside of the common benchmarks.

      Bottom line: For most of the year, EM debt has benefited from the tail wind of falling rates. But we believe that country selection - and the rigorous fundamental analysis that supports it - will become increasingly important as the broad-based rally fades.